Dressing for success
There is a moment that occasionally intrudes while watching modern television thrillers, a moment not of suspense but of arithmetic, when the viewer, having dutifully followed the betrayals, whispered briefings, and lingering shots of expensive
melancholy, suddenly wonders whether anyone involved has paused to calculate the bill.
Not the emotional bill, which is always extravagantly itemized, but the actual one.
Consider the recent incarnation of The Night Manager. Once upon a time, the story revolved around Richard Roper, played with silken menace by Hugh Laurie, a blue-eyed villain so charming, so civilized, so unnervingly reasonable that one almost forgot he trafficked in instruments of death. Laurie’s Roper did not snarl, posture, or perspire theatrically. He existed with that polished moral weightlessness peculiar to actors playing men who regard ethics as an administrative inconvenience.
Roper was dangerous precisely because he appeared so entirely at ease in the world.
In the newer version, however, the narrative seems to have migrated into stranger territory. We are introduced to a Colombian gangster who is, with the casual elasticity of television logic, revealed to be Roper’s son, a kind of Ricardo Ropez inheriting not merely wealth but wickedness, as though international arms dealing were a family bakery passed down genetically.
One half expects a crest and a Latin motto: Semper Profiteor.
The tonal shift is equally striking. Where the earlier adaptation simmered with chilly restraint, the newer telling occasionally looks remarkably like a Colombian soap opera: lingering glances heavy with implication, villains who do not merely threaten but sneer, emotional confrontations staged with soap operatic intensity, and a supporting cast apparently dedicated to botox and lip gloss.
Everyone looks magnificent, and suspicious.
The machinery of state whirs into motion with familiar enthusiasm. Agencies mobilize and operatives embed. Resources flow like champagne at a hedge fund Christmas party. Lives are risked with sober expressions and excellent lighting. All this to prevent what appears, on inspection, to be a criminal transaction whose scale, though undeniably lethal, feels curiously modest relative to the extravagance and intricacy of the response.
The viewer, seated comfortably and therefore entitled to naïve thoughts, may find himself asking whether risking multiple lives and perhaps twenty million dollars to derail a weapons delivery to a cartel-adjacent heir represents strategic necessity or narrative hypertrophy.
Spy fiction once handled such disproportion with a wink. The prototype, James Bond, never pretended to be invisible. He entered rooms like a man arriving at his own coronation, impeccably dressed, radiating conspicuous charisma. Bond. James Bond. “License to Kill #007” read his business card.
Villains, who have probably studied since birth prior Bond documentaries and news reports of the world being narrowly saved from nuclear destruction, biological warfare, space weapons and economic collapse with depressing regularity, dispensed with subtlety altogether.
“We have been expecting you, Mr. Bond.” Under the circumstances, what malefactor would not expect a visit? Absurd, yes, but it acknowledged the joke.
Contemporary thrillers attempt a more delicate fantasy. We are assured that the hero is undercover, unnoticed, seamlessly embedded, even as he glides through hostile territory with sculpted features, immaculate tailoring, and the unmistakable aura of a man whose bone structure alone would compromise any covert operation within minutes. A performer like Tom Hiddleston, elegant enough to sell a Swiss watch by adjusting his cuff, is tasked with convincing us that he has blended invisibly into the scenery in Medellin.
The mind hesitates, because looking like a character from an aftershave commercial is not generally regarded as effective camouflage.
(And yes, before someone writes in to inform me, this is the same Tom Hiddleston who briefly dated Taylor Swift, the high priestess of strategic heartbreak, a romantic subplot that felt, in its own way, more credible than certain espionage premises.)
What made the earlier adaptation memorable was not merely its budget but its restraint. Hugh Laurie’s Roper embodied Le Carré’s tradition of cultivated evil, where menace wore civility like a tailored suit. The danger felt plausible because it did not shout and the stakes did feel grave because they were not endlessly explained.
The newer telling, by contrast, leans toward velocity and melodrama. Villainy becomes hereditary. Subtlety yields to emphasis. Psychological tension competes with spectacle. The operation expands, the risks multiply, the cheekbones sharpen, the glossy lips gleam, and somewhere beneath the glossy surfaces the viewer’s small internal accountant begins clearing his throat.
Enormous expense. Extraordinary danger, and beautiful people suffering with style and elan.
To what precise end?
From a Cuenca living room, where genuine hazards include undercooked pork, misjudged ají, the theological creativity of local traffic patterns, and dog poop on the sidewalk the imbalance can feel faintly theatrical. Heroism, once framed as a tragic necessity, begins to resemble an expensive hobby conducted by governments with the spending discipline of hedge funds and the risk tolerance of young men trading stock options on margin.
Everything is urgent. Everything is justified. Everything is beautifully lit.
Older spy stories left room for doubt, for the unsettling possibility that even successful missions might feel morally lopsided or strategically ambiguous. Newer ones prefer clarity, momentum, and protagonists whose cheekbones suggest geopolitical significance.
The ledger no longer wobbles.
And so the viewer watches, entertained, faintly skeptical, dimly aware that beneath the orchestration and impeccably tailored peril lies a question too inelegant for the script, yet stubbornly alive in the mind of the audience.
Was it really worth it?
The Night Manager can be seen on Amazon Prime or on the BBC iPlayer.



























