Cuenca High Life logo
Click here to subscribe to daily news sent to your inbox!
Click here to subscribe to our weekly eNewspaper sent to your inbox!

Ecuador News

Organization of American States commission objects to election result of a referendum question

President Lenin Moreno says Ecuador will stand beside referendum election results to reorganize the Council for Citizen Participation and Social Control (CPCCS). On Tuesday, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, part of the Organization of American States (OAS), called on Ecuador to suspend efforts to replace the current members of CPCCS as a result of question three in the February 4 election.

President Lenin Moreno said Ecuador will not back on referendum election results.

By a 63 to 37 percent margin, voters approved the reorganization of CPCCS.

In a conversation to OAS Secretary General Luis Almagro, Moreno said Ecuador will not back down on the question. “I made it clear to the secretary general that although we are respectful of legitimate international organizations, we will enforce the popular mandate expressed at the ballot box,” the president said on his Twitter account.

Almagro responded by congratulating Moreno on his “electoral triumph” in the referendum, adding that the OAS human rights commission works in an advisory capacity to support democracy in the Americas.

The human rights commission recommendation not to follow through on provisions of question three was based on complaints by several members of the CPCCS.

The CPCCS, created by Ecuador’s 2008 constitution, is based on a Venezuelan council of the same name intended to increase public participation in the governance process. It is responsible for appointing officials, such as the Attorney General, the Comptroller General, as well as members of the National Electoral Council members, the Human Rights Ombudsman, and the judicial oversight board.

Critics have claimed that the council, as it was constituted in Ecuador, served as an extension of executive power during the presidency of Rafael Correa.

Following up on Moreno’s comments, the foreign ministry objected to the OAS’s interference in the “sovereign affairs of Ecuador.” In a statement the ministry said it, “rejects the human rights commission’s request as incomprehensible, unethical and contrary to the its legal proceedings.” It continued, that Ecuador is not under obligation to comply with the commission’s request.

6 thoughts on “Organization of American States commission objects to election result of a referendum question

  1. Who are these people on the CPCC? Most likely political loyalists selected by the president/regime to do his bidding under the fake guise of “citizen participation”.

    1. Correct, one example is Edwin Jarrin, vice president of the CPCC and husband of assembly member Soledad Buendía, a staunch Correa supporter.

    2. Why don’t you find out for us and objectively report back with your findings – sounds a little like uninformed gang mentality as only a speculation…..is that irresponsible?

      1. Since you have no answer, let’s go with the obvious. The president appoints the CPCC members (his cronies). They, in turn, do his bidding. stacking public offices with more cronies, consolidating power with the presidency. The problem with this strategy, in a democracy, is when a presidential election changes the balance of power. This tool now belongs to your opposition. Correa created it believing he’d never see it used against himself. Moreno could have exploited it, but chose a more deomcratic option to disband it. Correa’s fake calls to democracy are in vain.

    3. Uh, yes… That was exactly the point of the referendum vote. Correa created this council, but under the rules, groups can submit names to the president, but it is the sole discretion of the president of whom he allowed on. Not surprisingly, given Correa’s behavior in his last years, he only accepted those who agreed with him, and refused those who opposed him.

      Thus, Morea said it was simply an extension of presidential power. Referendum #3 (very poorly written, IMO) disbanded this group and creates a new group with the same powers, but directly selected by the people, rather than the president.

Comments are closed.