Opinions

Why the United States shouldn’t alienate Latin America

By Minneapolis Star-Tribune Editorial Staff

A frosty reception in sunny Mexico City awaited U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly on Wednesday, as they met with Mexican officials to talk about the implementation of the Trump administration’s more stringent immigration and deportation guidelines. An even colder response is probable as the administration advances President Trump’s pledge to build a border wall for which he wants Mexico to pay.

For more on the visit, click here.

The chill could be hemispheric if the wall becomes a barrier between better U.S.-Latin American relations. If so, it would be a major missed opportunity for a new administration already occupied with chronic crises in Asia, Africa and Europe.

This could and should be an era of newfound regional cohesion, especially since the so-called “pink tide” of leftist Latin American governments seems to be receding.

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson in Mexico City.

More conservative leaders are seated in Brasilia and Buenos Aires after incompetence and corruption corroded their predecessors’ rules. In Quito, the leftist presidential candidate Lenin Moreno faces a runoff with more centrist Guillermo Lasso to decide Ecuador’s election. And in Caracas, Venezuela’s socialist President Nicolas Maduro — lacking the cash (and charisma) of predecessor Hugo Chávez — has driven his country into chaos if not the brink of collapse.

This shift isn’t driven by ideology but rather a rejection of failed policies and a turn toward pragmatic approaches to governance, Michael Shifter, president of the Inter-American Dialogue, told attendees at a Global Minnesota event on Wednesday. Part of this pragmatism — urged on by the United States — is an embrace of free trade. And yet, Shifter said, in large part Trump based his campaign on an anti-trade and anti-immigration platform that is now embodied in the serious strains between the U.S. and Mexico.

Regardless of Trump’s position on free-trade agreements, many Latin American countries will still pursue transnational trade pacts. If the U.S. balks, it may play to China’s advantage.

“If the U.S. wants to pull back, China is very pleased to fill the void,” Shifter said, adding that they won’t do it for ideological but economic reasons.

While challenges abound, positive political developments do, too.

After decades of deadly strife between government forces and FARC guerrillas, peace seems a real possibility in Colombia. And renewed diplomatic relations between Washington and Havana have largely removed the Cuba excuse some Latin American leaders have used to distance their nations from the U.S.

These and other positive developments should be built upon, not squandered by unwise White House policies. It’s not too late for the administration to correct its course, or for Congress to intervene on the nation’s, and indeed the Western Hemisphere’s, behalf.

__________________

Credit: Minneapolis Star-Tribune, www.startribune.com

  • Almost All Knowing Eye

    What a breath of fresh political air on this website. I’m an American journalist based near Bend, Oregon, U.S.A. The American news media appears as its cliched old self by focusing on personalities rather than the real life implications of laws and policies of our government. I applaud the Ecuadoran people who debate over important issues rather than which mindless TV show to watch. America’s addiction to television is more than half its problem.

  • Globetrotter

    It is more than a little late to talk about America offending Latin America.

  • Jason Faulkner

    I’m always amazed how the change of power in Brazil is repeatedly held up as some sort of shift in public sentiment. It was a parliamentary coup perpetrated by a bunch of indicted senators who removed Dilma when she refused to block the cases against them. When Brazil returns to the polls (if they ever get an opportunity), they will vote even further left than they did in the last election.

    I wonder if journalists characterize it so erroneously out of ignorance or if it’s just spin.

  • Jason Faulkner

    There are 626 million people in Latin America. I’m not sure how the author thinks the US is even capable of isolating a region so large. The only thing it risks isolating is itself.